Our Sydney integration projects cover assessment, architecture, development, testing, and monitoring. Integration assessment (week 1): understanding the integration landscape. We document: systems inventory (every system in the tech stack — vendor, version, hosting, data it contains, and current integration status), data flows (how data currently moves between systems — automated integrations, manual processes, spreadsheet bridges, email-based transfers), pain points (where data inconsistency, manual effort, or process delays cause business problems — ranked by business impact), and API landscape (which systems have APIs? What type — REST, SOAP, GraphQL, webhooks? What are the rate limits, authentication methods, and documentation quality?). Integration architecture (weeks 1-2): designing the integration approach. We design: point-to-point vs. hub-and-spoke (for 2-3 integrations: direct connections between systems are simpler. For 5+ integrations: a central integration hub avoiding the N² complexity of point-to-point connections), real-time vs. batch (order processing: real-time — a customer order should appear in the ERP within seconds, not hours. Financial reporting: batch — daily aggregation is sufficient. We match integration frequency to business requirements), synchronous vs. asynchronous (critical operations: synchronous — the sending system waits for confirmation that the receiving system processed the data. Non-critical operations: asynchronous — the message is queued and processed when the receiving system is available — more resilient to temporary outages), error handling (what happens when an integration fails? Retry logic: automatic retry with exponential backoff. Dead letter queue: messages that repeatedly fail stored for investigation. Alerting: the team notified when failures occur. Reconciliation: periodic checks verifying that data in all systems is consistent), and idempotency (ensuring that processing the same message twice doesn't create duplicate records — critical for financial data where duplicate transactions would be a serious error). Development (weeks 2-6): building the integrations. Technology: Node.js or Python for integration logic (depending on the team's existing skills), running as serverless functions (AWS Lambda — cost-effective for event-driven integrations, scaling automatically), or as containers (ECS Fargate — for long-running integration processes). Message queue: AWS SQS for asynchronous integrations (reliable message delivery, automatic retry, dead letter queue for failed messages). API gateway: for integrations that expose APIs — rate limiting, authentication, request validation, and logging. Monitoring: CloudWatch for metrics and alerting, structured logging for debugging integration issues. For each integration: a detailed specification (data mapping, transformation logic, error handling, testing plan) reviewed with stakeholders before development begins. Common integration patterns: webhook receiver (e-commerce system sends an order webhook → integration processes the order → creates the corresponding record in the ERP), scheduled sync (every 15 minutes: check for new or updated records in the source system → transform → load into the target system), event-driven (a record change in one system publishes an event → multiple downstream systems consume the event and update accordingly), and file-based (legacy systems that can't use APIs — generating CSV/XML files, processed by the integration, and loaded into the target system). Testing (weeks 5-6): verifying integration reliability. Unit testing: each transformation and mapping function tested with sample data — verifying correct output for normal cases, edge cases, and error cases. Integration testing: end-to-end testing with actual systems (in staging/sandbox environments) — verifying that data flows correctly from source to target. Load testing: simulating production volume — verifying that integrations handle peak load without failure or excessive latency. Error scenario testing: deliberately introducing failures (system unavailable, malformed data, duplicate messages) — verifying that error handling works correctly. Monitoring and operations (ongoing): ensuring integrations remain reliable. Dashboard: real-time visibility into integration health — messages processed, success rate, error rate, latency, and queue depth. Alerting: automatic alerts when: error rate exceeds threshold, latency exceeds threshold, queue depth grows (indicating processing backlog), or a specific integration hasn't run on schedule. Reconciliation: scheduled comparisons between connected systems — verifying that data is consistent (e.g., order count in e-commerce matches order count in ERP for the same period).