ZTABS delivers UI/UX design in Atlanta — user experience design for payment processors creating merchant-facing dashboards that simplify complex financial data, healthcare systems building patient portals and clinical interfaces that clinicians actually use, logistics companies designing operations dashboards that give dispatchers real-time visibility without information overload, and airport-adjacent businesses creating traveller service interfaces for the 93M+ annual passengers at Hartsfield-Jackson.
UI/UX design in Atlanta creates interfaces that enable users to accomplish complex tasks efficiently — not just attractive screens but functional design that understands the user's context, constraints, and goals well enough to make difficult workflows feel natural. Atlanta's UI/UX landscape is shaped by: payment platform complexity (merchant dashboards displaying transaction data, settlement information, chargeback management, and pricing details — financial information that must be accurate, understandable, and actionable for users who range from small business owners checking daily sales to financial controllers reconciling multi-location processing. UX: designing for the full spectrum of payment platform users without overwhelming beginners or frustrating power users), healthcare interface constraints (clinical interfaces competing for attention in environments where physicians have 15 seconds to review a screen before the next patient, nurses monitor 6-8 patients simultaneously, and patients access portals with widely varying technical literacy. UX: designing healthcare interfaces that communicate critical information quickly, protect patient safety, and remain accessible across the full range of users), logistics operational urgency (dispatch and operations dashboards displaying real-time freight status where delayed decisions cascade into missed deliveries, idle trucks, and customer dissatisfaction. UX: designing operational interfaces that surface exceptions and required actions rather than burying them in data that operators must search through), and traveller service time pressure (airport traveller interfaces used by people who are navigating unfamiliar environments, managing tight connections, and dealing with the stress of travel. UX: designing interfaces that provide instant value without learning curves for users who will use the application once or infrequently)).
Atlanta's UI/UX demand spans payment platforms, healthcare systems, logistics operations, and travel services. Payment platform UX: merchant-facing design. UX requirements: financial data visualisation (designing how transaction data, settlement information, and financial metrics are presented to merchants — daily summaries for small merchants, detailed analytics for large merchants, and export capabilities for accounting staff. The visualisation: making financial data understandable and actionable rather than requiring merchants to interpret raw numbers), merchant onboarding flow (designing the merchant application and onboarding experience — the flow that converts merchant interest into active processing. The flow: minimising friction and abandonment while collecting the information that underwriting and compliance require), and chargeback management (designing the interface through which merchants review, respond to, and manage chargebacks — a process that is complex, time-sensitive, and stressful for merchants. The management: guiding merchants through chargeback response with clear deadlines, required actions, and response templates). Healthcare UX: clinical and patient interfaces. UX requirements: clinical workflow design (designing interfaces for clinical users — physician documentation, nurse task management, and care coordination screens. The design: information architecture and interaction patterns that fit the clinical workflow rather than forcing clinicians to adapt to the software's structure), patient portal experience (designing the patient-facing interface — appointment scheduling, health records, messaging, and bill payment. The experience: accessible design that works for elderly patients managing chronic conditions and tech-savvy patients who expect consumer-grade mobile experiences), and clinical decision support display (designing how clinical decision support information appears within the clinical workflow — alerts, recommendations, and reference information presented without disrupting the provider's workflow or creating alert fatigue. The display: the design challenge of getting critical information to clinicians without overwhelming them). Logistics operations UX: real-time operational design. UX requirements: dispatch dashboard design (designing the interface through which dispatchers manage shipments, drivers, and exceptions — real-time status, exception alerts, and action tools for the users who coordinate physical freight movement. The design: information density balanced with clarity for users who monitor dozens of concurrent shipments), warehouse operations interface (designing the mobile and terminal interfaces for warehouse workers — pick, pack, and ship screens used by workers who are standing, moving, and handling products. The interface: glanceable information, large touch targets, and minimal interaction steps for users who cannot focus on a screen), and customer visibility portal (designing the interface through which shippers track their freight — status, ETA, and documentation access for users who range from logistics professionals to office managers who ship occasionally. The portal: self-service design that reduces "where's my shipment?" calls). Travel service UX: traveller-centred design. UX requirements: airport navigation (designing wayfinding interfaces for airport travellers — terminal navigation, gate finding, and facility location for stressed travellers in unfamiliar environments. The navigation: instant utility without onboarding for infrequent users), booking and reservation (designing the booking experience for airport services — parking, lounge access, and ground transportation for travellers who are planning or actively travelling. The booking: fast, confident transactions for users making time-sensitive decisions), and multi-modal information (designing interfaces that display travel information from multiple sources — flight status, ground transportation options, weather, and terminal services presented coherently. The information: unified travel context rather than separate data streams).
Our Atlanta UI/UX methodology addresses user research, interaction design, and the usability testing that validates design decisions with real users. User research: designing from understanding. Contextual inquiry: observing users in their actual environment — watching merchants navigate payment dashboards, shadowing clinicians during documentation, observing dispatchers managing freight, and tracking travellers through airport interactions. The inquiry: understanding the context, constraints, and workarounds that define real user behaviour. User personas and journeys: research synthesised into personas representing distinct user types and journey maps documenting the paths users take through complex workflows. The personas: design decisions anchored in user reality rather than assumption. Interaction design: interfaces that work for real people. Information architecture: organising content and functionality based on how users think about their tasks — not how the database is structured or how features were built. The architecture: navigation and layout that feel natural to users rather than reflecting engineering organisation. Progressive disclosure: complex interfaces revealing detail incrementally — summary views for quick assessment, detail views for investigation, and expert views for power users. The disclosure: avoiding both the information overload of showing everything and the frustration of hiding needed information. Usability testing: validating with real users. Prototype testing: interactive prototypes tested with real users before development — identifying usability issues when they cost hours to fix rather than weeks. The testing: design decisions validated by user behaviour rather than stakeholder opinion. Iterative refinement: designs refined based on test results — each testing round identifying issues and each refinement round addressing them. The refinement: the design improvement cycle that distinguishes good interfaces from great ones.
Payment Processing / Merchant Services
An Atlanta payment processor (68,000 merchant accounts, $28B annual processing volume) was losing merchants partly due to its merchant dashboard — a 9-year-old interface that merchants consistently rated as the worst aspect of their processing relationship. Dashboard problems: (1) merchant satisfaction — merchant dashboard satisfaction: 2.1/5 across annual surveys. Top complaints: "can't find what I need" (42%), "too complicated" (31%), "doesn't work well on my phone" (18%), "information is confusing" (9%). The dissatisfaction: directly cited in 28% of merchant attrition conversations — merchants leaving for competitors with better self-service tools, (2) call volume — merchant calls to customer support for information available in the dashboard: 14,200 per month. Top call reasons: "what was my settlement amount?" (23%), "I need to see my statement" (19%), "how do I respond to this chargeback?" (16%), "what fees am I being charged?" (14%), "can you explain this transaction?" (12%). The volume: merchants calling because the dashboard was too difficult to use, costing $680K annually in support labour, (3) chargeback response rate — merchants receiving chargeback notifications through the dashboard had a 34% response rate — meaning 66% of representable chargebacks went uncontested. Merchant confusion: merchants not understanding the chargeback process, not finding the response interface, or missing response deadlines. Lost chargeback revenue: estimated $2.8M annually in chargebacks that merchants could have won with timely, informed responses, (4) mobile unusability — 62% of merchants accessing the dashboard from mobile devices, but the interface was desktop-designed and not responsive. Mobile experience: tiny text, horizontal scrolling, and buttons too small to tap reliably. Mobile session duration: 1.2 minutes (vs. 4.8 minutes on desktop) — mobile users quickly abandoning the unusable interface, and (5) onboarding drop-off — new merchants receiving dashboard access credentials but 41% never logging in during their first month. First-login experience: a dense homepage with 22 navigation items, financial data requiring context to interpret, and no guided introduction. The drop-off: merchants forming their impression of the processing relationship partly through the dashboard — and first impressions were poor.
We redesigned the merchant dashboard through a comprehensive UX process over 12 weeks. User research (weeks 1-3). Merchant research: 28 merchant interviews across segments — small single-location merchants (hourly or daily dashboard use for basic sales checking), multi-location merchants (daily use for cross-location comparison and management reporting), and large enterprise merchants (weekly use for financial reconciliation and dispute management). Research findings: small merchants wanted a simple daily summary ("how did I do today?"). Multi-location merchants wanted comparison and trend views. Enterprise merchants wanted data export and financial detail. All segments: wanted mobile access that actually worked. Support call analysis: 400 support call recordings analysed — identifying the specific information requests and task failures that drove each call category. The analysis: designing the dashboard to answer the exact questions merchants were calling about. Chargeback workflow observation: 12 merchants observed attempting to respond to chargebacks — identifying the specific points where they abandoned the process (confusing terminology, unclear deadlines, multi-step evidence submission). The observation: understanding why 66% of representable chargebacks went uncontested. Information architecture redesign (weeks 2-5). Role-based dashboards: three dashboard experiences designed for distinct merchant segments — Quick View (small merchants: today's sales, deposited amount, and alerts in a single mobile-optimised screen), Business View (multi-location merchants: comparison dashboards, trend analytics, and team management), and Finance View (enterprise merchants: reconciliation tools, detailed reporting, and data export). The architecture: each merchant seeing the information relevant to their role rather than a one-size-fits-all interface. Task-oriented navigation: navigation reorganised around merchant tasks — "See My Money" (settlement and deposits), "Review Transactions" (transaction search and detail), "Handle Disputes" (chargeback management), "Understand My Fees" (pricing and fee transparency), and "Manage My Account" (account settings and team management). The navigation: 5 clear task categories replacing 22 ambiguous navigation items. Mobile-first design: dashboard designed mobile-first — the mobile experience as the primary design target with desktop enhanced for larger screens rather than the reverse. The design: acknowledging that 62% of merchants accessed the dashboard on mobile and designing for their reality. Interaction design (weeks 3-8). Daily summary: the default dashboard view answering "how did I do today?" — today's sales total, comparison to same day last week, deposit amount and date, and any items requiring attention (chargebacks, holds, compliance requests). The summary: the information that small merchants needed visible within 2 seconds of opening the dashboard. Settlement transparency: settlement information redesigned for clarity — gross processing amount, itemised deductions (interchange, fees, adjustments), and net deposit amount presented as a clear waterfall visualisation. The transparency: merchants understanding their settlement without calling support to ask "why is my deposit different from my sales?" Chargeback guided response: chargeback management redesigned as a guided workflow — plain-language explanation of what happened, clear deadline with countdown, step-by-step evidence submission with templates and suggestions, and progress tracking. The workflow: transforming the confusing chargeback process into a guided task that merchants could complete confidently. Fee transparency: pricing information presented as "what did each transaction cost?" — merchants seeing the fee for each transaction rather than trying to interpret aggregate fee categories on monthly statements. The transparency: addressing the "what fees am I being charged?" calls through self-service clarity. Usability testing and refinement (weeks 6-12). Prototype testing: interactive prototypes tested with 18 merchants across all segments — task completion rates measured for key scenarios: finding today's settlement, responding to a chargeback, understanding monthly fees, and comparing locations. Initial testing: identified 23 usability issues. Refinement: all issues addressed in subsequent design iterations. Second round testing: task completion rates exceeding 90% for all key scenarios. Accessibility audit: dashboard tested for WCAG AA compliance — colour contrast, screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation, and text sizing for the merchant population that included users with visual impairments. The audit: ensuring the dashboard was accessible to all merchants.
The redesigned merchant dashboard launched across all 68,000 merchants within 14 weeks. Merchant satisfaction: dashboard satisfaction: from 2.1/5 to 4.4/5 — the single largest satisfaction improvement in the processor's annual survey. Dashboard-related attrition mentions: from 28% of attrition conversations to 4%. Net Promoter Score: dashboard NPS from -34 to +41 — transforming the dashboard from the worst-rated to the highest-rated aspect of the processing relationship. Support call reduction: information-available-in-dashboard calls: from 14,200/month to 4,100/month — 71% reduction. Settlement enquiry calls: reduced 84% — the waterfall visualisation making settlement amounts self-explanatory. Fee enquiry calls: reduced 76% — transaction-level fee transparency replacing confusing aggregate statements. Annual support cost reduction: $480K. Chargeback response improvement: chargeback response rate: from 34% to 72% — the guided workflow enabling merchants to respond confidently. Chargebacks won through merchant response: increased 68%. Merchant chargeback loss recovery: estimated $1.9M annually in chargebacks that merchants now successfully contested. Mobile engagement: mobile session duration: from 1.2 minutes to 5.8 minutes — mobile-first design creating an actually usable mobile experience. Mobile daily active users: increased 340% — merchants using the dashboard on mobile because it now worked. Mobile-originated chargeback responses: 48% — merchants responding to chargebacks from their phone, which the old interface made impossible. New merchant activation: first-month login rate: from 59% to 94% — guided onboarding and simplified first-login experience driving activation. New merchant dashboard satisfaction: 4.6/5 — first impressions transformed from confusing to welcoming. Merchant retention impact: merchant attrition: reduced 3.2 percentage points attributable to dashboard improvement (based on attrition conversation analysis). Retained processing volume: approximately $890M annually. Revenue impact of retained volume: $4.8M annually. Financial results: merchant retention revenue: $4.8M/year. Chargeback recovery improvement: $1.9M/year. Support call reduction: $480K/year. Total annual impact: $7.18M/year. UX design and development: $340,000. Annual operations: $36,000/year. First-year ROI: 2,012%.
User interviews, competitor analysis, and journey mapping to uncover what your users actually need.
Pixel-perfect interfaces with consistent visual language, typography, and color systems.
Interactive prototypes tested with real users before development begins.
Scalable component libraries and design tokens that keep your product consistent as it grows.
Comprehensive audits of existing products with actionable recommendations to improve usability and conversion.
Designs that work on every screen size and meet WCAG accessibility standards.
Atlanta's UI/UX market includes design agencies (offering visual design and brand work but without the user research, interaction design, and domain expertise that complex B2B and healthcare interfaces require), UX consultancies (offering research and strategy but not the implementation support that ensures designs are built as intended), development agencies that include design (offering design as part of development but often treating UX as a pre-development phase rather than an ongoing practice), and in-house design teams (offering brand knowledge but sometimes lacking the specialised skills for payment platform, clinical interface, or logistics dashboard design). ZTABS differentiates through domain-specific UX expertise (payment platforms, healthcare interfaces, logistics dashboards, and travel services — understanding the users, workflows, and constraints of each industry), research-grounded design (user research, contextual inquiry, and usability testing — designs based on observed user behaviour rather than stakeholder assumptions), mobile-first approach (interfaces designed for how users actually access applications — mobile-first for merchants and travellers, clinical-workflow-first for healthcare, and operational-context-first for logistics), and measurable UX outcomes (design measured by task completion rate, support call reduction, and business metrics — not just aesthetic improvement but quantifiable usability and business impact).
UI/UX design in Atlanta ranges by research depth and design complexity. UX audit and recommendations (2-4 weeks, heuristic review + user testing): $15,000-$40,000. Application UX design (research + design + testing, 6-12 weeks): $60,000-$180,000. Enterprise UX programme (multi-product, design system, ongoing, 12-20 weeks): $150,000-$400,000. Ongoing UX optimisation: $5,000-$15,000/month.
Verified reviews from real client engagements — sourced from our public testimonial archive and Clutch profile.
My experience is throughout positive. Communication, service, the short response times and the flawless execution of a challenging topic was absolutely great. ZTABS is definitely my first choice again.
Christian Neff
Bank Software Advisory · Bank Software Advisory
Fintech
Fantastic Agency! I couldn't fault them even if I tried. They always go above and beyond to meet your expectations and always produces quality work. Thank you ZTABS.
Stephanie Kal
CEO · Beauty Finder Australia
Marketplace
It has been great working with ZTABS. They bounce off the ideas along the way. Amazing Experience.
Joel Rowe
CEO · Drill Quoter
Marketplace
We don't just contract. We ship and operate our own software. 23 products in production.
Common questions about UI/UX design for Atlanta businesses
Progressive disclosure — simple default views for quick tasks with detail available on demand. Role-based dashboards show different default experiences for different user types. Our payment dashboard serves small merchants checking daily sales and enterprise controllers doing reconciliation from the same platform.
ZTABS is a remote-first UI/UX design agency serving Houston businesses — including ux research & strategy, ui design & visual identity, wireframing & prototyping. We work with Energy & Oil/Gas, Healthcare & Biotech, Aerospace & Defense companies in Houston, TX via timezone-aligned engineers and async workflows; we do not have a local office, and we are explicit about that with every client.
UI/UX Design in New York, NYZTABS is a remote-first UI/UX design agency serving New York businesses — including ux research & strategy, ui design & visual identity, wireframing & prototyping. We work with Finance & Fintech, Media & Advertising, Fashion & Retail companies in New York, NY via timezone-aligned engineers and async workflows; we do not have a local office, and we are explicit about that with every client.
UI/UX Design in Los Angeles, CAZTABS is a remote-first UI/UX design agency serving Los Angeles businesses — including ux research & strategy, ui design & visual identity, wireframing & prototyping. We work with Entertainment & Media, E-commerce & DTC Brands, Gaming & AR/VR companies in Los Angeles, CA via timezone-aligned engineers and async workflows; we do not have a local office, and we are explicit about that with every client.
Web Development in Atlanta, GAZTABS is a remote-first web development agency serving Atlanta businesses — including full-stack development, progressive web apps, api development. We work with Fintech & Payments, Cybersecurity, Film & Media Production companies in Atlanta, GA via timezone-aligned engineers and async workflows; we do not have a local office, and we are explicit about that with every client.
Web Design in Atlanta, GAZTABS is a remote-first web design agency serving Atlanta businesses — including ui/ux design, responsive design, custom interfaces. We work with Fintech & Payments, Cybersecurity, Film & Media Production companies in Atlanta, GA via timezone-aligned engineers and async workflows; we do not have a local office, and we are explicit about that with every client.
AI Development in Atlanta, GAZTABS is a remote-first AI development agency serving Atlanta businesses — including llm integration & fine-tuning, ai agents & automation, rag & knowledge systems. We work with Fintech & Payments, Cybersecurity, Film & Media Production companies in Atlanta, GA via timezone-aligned engineers and async workflows; we do not have a local office, and we are explicit about that with every client.
UI/UX DesignLearn more about our UI/UX design services nationwide.
Partner with ZTABS for expert UI/UX design in Atlanta. Get a free consultation today.
